Cardiology Calculators
Cardiovascular risk assessment and management tools based on ACC/AHA, ESC, and Framingham Heart Study guidelines. From 10-year CVD risk prediction to QTc monitoring for drug safety — all with guideline-based interpretation built in.
10-Year CVD Risk Interpretation
Based on Framingham Heart Study and ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations guidance for primary prevention statin therapy decisions.
QTc Correction Formulas at a Glance
All four formulas are calculated simultaneously in our QTc Calculator. Normal QTc: <440 ms (male), <460 ms (female). Prolonged: >500 ms (high TdP risk).
About Cardiology Calculators
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, responsible for approximately 18 million deaths annually. Quantifying individual risk precisely — and stratifying patients into management pathways based on validated scores — is one of the most impactful things a clinician can do in primary and secondary prevention. MediCalc Pro's cardiology tools are built directly from the original study data and aligned with current ACC/AHA and ESC guideline recommendations.
The Framingham Risk Score — Primary Prevention Foundation
The Framingham Heart Study, begun in 1948 and still ongoing, generated the foundational data for cardiovascular risk prediction in Western populations. The Framingham Risk Score uses age, sex, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment, smoking, and diabetes to estimate 10-year CVD risk. It remains the most widely taught risk tool globally and is embedded in guidelines from the British, Australian, and many other national cardiovascular societies.
Note that the 2013 ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) are now preferred in US guidelines for statin therapy decisions — our Framingham tool includes a note on this distinction and when each tool is most appropriate.
QTc Monitoring — A Drug Safety Essential
Drug-induced QT prolongation and the resulting risk of torsades de pointes (TdP) — a potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmia — has led to the withdrawal of multiple drugs from the market and is a mandatory monitoring parameter during therapy with hundreds of common medications including antipsychotics, antibiotics (particularly fluoroquinolones and macrolides), antifungals, antiemetics, and antiarrhythmics.
The QT interval must be corrected for heart rate (producing QTc) because the raw QT varies inversely with heart rate. The choice of correction formula matters — Bazett's formula, though most commonly used, overestimates QTc significantly at heart rates above 100 bpm and underestimates at bradycardic rates. Our QTc Calculator shows all four validated formulas simultaneously so you can see where they agree and where they diverge.
ACS Risk Stratification — TIMI vs. HEART
The TIMI score and HEART score are complementary rather than competing tools, designed for different stages of the clinical pathway:
| Score | Best Used When | Decision It Supports | Low-Risk Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| HEART Score | Undifferentiated chest pain in ED | Safe early discharge vs admission | 0–3: <2% MACE at 6 weeks → discharge |
| TIMI Score | Confirmed UA or NSTEMI | Early invasive vs conservative strategy | 0–1: ~5% 14-day event rate → conservative |
Frequently Asked Questions
What factors does the Framingham Risk Score use?
What QTc value is considered dangerously prolonged?
How is the HEART score calculated?
Is the Framingham Risk Score appropriate for all populations?
Which QTc formula should I use in clinical practice?
Related Tools on MediCalc Pro
For stroke risk in atrial fibrillation, see CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score. For anticoagulation dosing based on CHA₂DS₂-VASc result, see the Weight-Based Dose Calculator. For DVT/PE pre-test probability, see Wells Score. For QT-prolonging drug monitoring alongside CrCl, see Creatinine Clearance. For body weight and BMI in cardiac risk context, see BMI Calculator.
References & Guidelines
- Wilson PW, et al. "Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories." Circulation. 1998;97(18):1837-1847.
- Goff DC Jr, et al. "2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk." JACC. 2014;63(25):2935-2959.
- Bazett HC. "An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms." Heart. 1920;7:353-370.
- Fridericia LS. "Die Systolendauer im Elektrokardiogramm." Acta Med Scand. 1920;53:469-486.
- Antman EM, et al. "The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI." JAMA. 2000;284(7):835-842.
- Backus BE, et al. "A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients." Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(3):2153-2158.